Saturday, 6 September 2014

Rocky! : Stalactites, Wyoming Springs, German Castles and bits of cool Stuff

Firstly, it'd be nice to give everyone a chance to hear the original Rocky signature tune. Listening to it forty years on, you'll realize that it didn't take thousands of years to compose. In fact, renowned American composer Bill Conti penned the music for it in or about 1976 and has probably been laughing all the way to the bank ever since.



But let's have a look at another type of rocky feature, Stalactites - you know, those long pointy stone things that hang from the roofs of limestone caves dotted in many places around the world. In fact I saw some first hand recently in Dunmore Caves near Kilkenny, here in Ireland. They were super cool, apart from one huge one that had been blown up with dynamite in the 1920s by some guy who thought he'd like most of it in his private collection. All that is left is a blackened stump. Big shame. Anyway, evolutionists tell us that the big ones can be from tens of thousands to a few hundred thousands of years old. This is mainly because evolutionists generally assume vast swathes of time have occurred each time they find stuff. And you have to admit, at first look, Stalactites really do look Lord-of-the-Rings old!



Limestone Stalactites, also known as Speleothems *, form when water dissolves the limestone rock it passes through, then chemically deposits the results as it drips from the cave roof. As the mineral-rich water encounters the air inside the cave, the salts reform into limestone. The important thing to note at this point is that there are a lot of variables that can affect the rate of formation of the Stalactite, like how acidic the water flow is to begin with, how rich in Calcium Carbonate it becomes during it's journey, the rate of water flow, whether that rate of flow has varied over time or not etc.

That brings us to the mineral springs in Thermopolis, Wyoming. Thermopolis is a town of about 3,000 inhabitants and is home to numerous natural hot springs. The springs opened to the public in 1896 as part of an agreement with the Arapaho Indians. In the early 1900s, an enterprizing local decided to conduct an experiment that might attract even more visitors. So he inserted a long pipe downwards through the rock surface til it reached the steaming hot spring waters. The pipe extended above ground level quite a few feet also. Around the visible part of the pipe, he built a stone Tepee (I'm not sure if this made the dispossessed Native Americans feel any better or not) and the spring waters flowed down the sides of the structure thus :


The site was opened as a tourist attraction in 1909. Over the succeeding decades, limestone deposits began to build up on the outer sides of the tepee. The particular form of limestone deposited is known as Travertine. Today, Tepee Fountain, as it became known, looks like this (a recent amateur video uploaded by a visitor to Thermopolis via You Tube - please tilt your head sideways for parts of the short clip!) :


Formed in just over 100 years. Amazing! Travertine indeed is a very solid form of limestone. In fact, Burghausen Castle in Bavaria, Germany (pictured below) ** began construction nearly 1,000 years ago and is made almost entirely from Travertine and it certainly has stood the test of time.


So, given the right conditions, Speleothems can form remarkably quickly. The difficulty with a purely evolutionary view of Stalactite formation is that uniformitarianism *** is generally assumed, that is, that the rate of formation of Stalactites and Stalagmites (the variety that grow upwards from a cave floor) was the same in the past as it is today. It is true that many of these formations are growing very slowly now, as little as 0.13mm per year, but that doesn't mean what you do is just calculate backwards at the current growth rate and come up with an age of 150,000 + years. It's interesting that evolutionists have somewhat abandoned uniformitarianism as the overall mechanism of evolution, but still insert the hypothesis in many of their other analyses. By the way, in the picture beneath, a bat was found to have been captured by a Stalagmite in Carlsbad Caverns, New Mexico **** before the corpse had even had time to decay.


There are many other examples of speedy Stalactite formation in the man-made world also. The chemical process is quite different in these cases from those in limestone caves, but the fact remains again, that given the right conditions, these structures can form remarkably quickly when water flows through stone, or as in these cases, concrete. The below pictures come from the basements of the Lincoln Memorial, Washington U.S.A. (built in 1923), the George Rogers Clark Memorial, Indiana U.S.A. (completed in 1934) and from level 5 of a lead mine at Mt Isa in Queensland Australia!









An alternative Biblical explanation for Speleothems may come from the account of the Flood of Noah which according to Scripture occurred around 4,500 years ago. Genesis chapters 6 and 7 record that during a worldwide flood, not only did it rain pretty spectacularly, but also that the "springs of the great deep burst forth" (Gen 7:11-12) all over the earth. In this account, enormous lava streams and boiling mineral-laden geysers could easily have precipitated the subsequent rapid formation of rocky cave growths. After the floods subsided (Gen 8:14), the rate of formation of these phenomena would have decreased relatively quickly, in time to the much lower rates we see today. In this scenario, a uniformitarian evolutionary interpretation of how we got Speleothems would of course be completely misleading. Evolutionists use standard ways of assigning age to rocks such as Radiometric and Argon dating. It would be an interesting experiment if such dating tests were applied to Tepee Fountain!

The bottom line is this : the fact that rocky formations can form quickly does not prove that in particular cases, it has done. But equally, it is not possible to prove long timescales in specific examples either. However, once again, in educational institutions, lecturers are limited in what they can say on the subject of origins - alternative interpretations to that of evolution are universally not offered.

By the way, if you want to make your own mini Stalactite of sorts, you might even try this for a bit of fun!


Thanks for reading!

*        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speleothem
**       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burghausen_Castle
***      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformitarianism
****     http://creationwiki.org/Stalactite_and_stalagmite





Tuesday, 12 August 2014

Archaeopteryx was a Birdie!

For around a century, evolutionists have told us that fossils of Archaeopteryx show it to be an undeniable intermediary form between Reptiles and Birds. To date, eleven specimens  have been found, primarily in Germany and China. What has made evolutionists so set on this particular fossil for so long?




"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution." 

(Dr. George Wald, evolutionist, Professor Emeritus of Biology at the University at Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology.) 

Well, if only all evolutionists were as honest as Dr. Wald! But since they aren't, many will stick like glue to any shred of evidence that could lend the tiniest bit of weight to their belief system. So, back to Archie (for short!). In addition to fully bird-like feathers (some specimens do not show feathers, but just like wide variations within kinds in many species today, this does not indicate evolution, just amazing versatility in creature DNA as God designed it), Archie had wing claws, a bony tail, was three toed and had teeth, which are the main four supposed links with reptiles. 

- but there are birds still living that have clawed wings including Ostriches, Touracos and Hoatzins (below)


- there are also birds today that have bony tails, such as Penguins (as seen from the skeleton below)



- although most living birds today have four toes, not all do. For example, Emus, Button Quails (below) and Kori Bustards are all three toed. 



- no bird living today has enameled teeth. But that does not mean because some extinct birds do, that they evolved from reptiles. Reptiles usually have teeth, but not all do (which does not make the latter non-reptiles). The converse is apparently true of birds. And, of course, there are birds today that have "teeth" which comprise of either beak or bone serrations, such as the common goose (below). 




 Because Archie had feathered wings, we know it was warm-blooded, not cold-blooded like reptiles so no connection is indicated there. None of the "Archie" fossils discovered after more than a century of digs show any evidence whatsoever of body scales, so to classify it as a transitional form is truly fanciful. BBC News online ran an article in 2004 which reported that Dr Angela Miller of the London Natural History Museum had concluded from extensive research of Archie's brain, using a method called "commuted tomography scanning" that it was found to have "all the structures that allowed birds to fly" and that the brain, which they expected to show transitional reptilian features was instead "completely bird-like" * The obvious conclusive would be that Archie was a bird then. As has been pointed out  :


"Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur ....but it’s not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that."

(Allan Feduccia, Professor of biology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "Archaeopteryx: Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms", Science, Vol. 259, 5 February 1993, p. 764)

 If Archie had evolved from reptiles, why have no earlier versions of Archie been found showing limbs turning into wings or scales into feathers, the real tests of evolution? But no such examples of Archie have been found. Nevertheless, evolutionists continue to insist (as of July 2014), as they have done for decades now that Archie is a transitional form, despite the fact that we now know that at least some varieties of the bird were one hundred per cent feathered, including on it's legs, as one of the more recently found specimens (below) has shown. ** 



 * http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3535272.stm

** http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28129078