Sunday 30 March 2014

Non-Intelligent Design?



Atheistic Evolutionists are the only people in the world who believe that a building plan can magically appear without being designed by an architect - as long as you give it enough time so that nobody can comprehend the amount, the plans, all nicely laid out and tied with a blue ribbon will appear out of nowhere. The great "Time" fraud rears it's head regularly in the evolutionary fairy tale. And, the same section of the scientific community are the only people in the world, as far as we can tell, who believe a complex, "no expense spared" building will then be constructed in a secure and upward direction, without the assistance of a single construction worker. Miraculous!!


Of course, everybody knows that neither of these things are going to happen in a month of Sundays, or in a quiver full of billions of years, but because atheistic evolutionists give all this a name and call it “natural selection”, many of us then seem to say, “Well...ummm, it must be ok because it has a scientific-sounding name and the establishment says it's true”.  Natural selection is the name given to the process whereby non-intelligence came up with a design and then implemented it through non-workers. In reality of course, natural selection does not exist. It’s just a term thought up by guys who decided two things : (a) God is not real and (b) since we are definitely here, we got here somehow; so we’ll give that somehow a name even though we can’t demonstrate it, don't understand it and can't prove it - and anybody who says all this may not be science at all is a fool and a rogue, or worse still, may be a religious person.


What the onlooker has to do is : decide which view of first causes is most likely to be true (or least unlikely to be false, if you prefer). This isn't easy because we are taught not to question the evolutionary model and to suspend our critical faculties when examining it's tenets. Tenets is a good word here, because evolutionism is of course one of the best examples of a faith-based religion we have. It's the religion of non-belief in a Creator. And it's a belief that takes gritted-teeth faith on the part of it's adherents. Nevertheless, there are clues to help us work out if this religion - practiced so fervently by so many - is likely to be a fact or not. For example, we already know 100% for sure that :

Engineers draft up technical drawings
Animators draw cartoons
Doctors cure illnesses
Architects sketch blueprints
Entrepreneurs create business plans
Chefs concoct recipes and cook meals
Air Traffic Controllers direct incoming flights
Coaches manage Football teams
Lawgivers draw up legislation
Musicians compose songs
Clergymen pen sermons
Academics give lectures
Economists explain downturns
Artists paint pictures
Sculptors model clay
Revolutionaries plot coups
Pilots fly airplanes
Authors write books
Surgeons perform operations
Gardeners plant seeds and tend flower beds
Teachers prepare the next generation....

As you can see, this is not an exhaustive list. It’s just a very hastily drawn up selection from what could be thousands, maybe millions of similar examples from daily life that we can observe * (the essence of scientific investigation), which shows us that creative result is always the product of creative actions - which in turn spring from a creative mind. Yes, we are very familiar with cause and effect. But atheistic evolutionists have tried very hard to get us used to a different idea that has no observable examples in operation and is contradicted by the principle just illustrated. Apparently, they figure if they just say it loudly enough and often enough; and if they can maintain their monopoly on the educational curriculum, that the whole world will be left with no choice but to call it scientific truth.



And obligingly, we have.

*  http://www.sciencemadesimple.com/science-definition.html    "...This system uses observation (my italics added) and experimentation to describe and explain natural phenomena."

No comments:

Post a Comment